首页> 外文OA文献 >Application of cardiovascular disease risk prediction models and the relevance of novel biomarkers to risk stratification in Asian Indians
【2h】

Application of cardiovascular disease risk prediction models and the relevance of novel biomarkers to risk stratification in Asian Indians

机译:心血管疾病风险预测模型的应用以及新型生物标志物与亚洲印第安人风险分层的相关性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The increasing pressure on health resources has led to the emergence of risk assessment as an essential tool in the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Concern exists regarding the validity of their generalization to all populations. Existing risk scoring models do not incorporate emerging ‘novel’ risk factors. In this context, the aim of the study was to examine the relevance of British, European, and Framingham predictive CVD risk scores to the asymptomatic high risk Indian population. Blood samples drawn from the participants were analyzed for various ‘traditional’ and ‘novel’ biomarkers, and their CVD risk factor profiling was also done. The Framingham model defined only 5% of the study cohort to be at high risk, which appears to be an underestimation of CVD risk in this genetically predisposed population. These subjects at high risk had significantly elevated levels of lipid, pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic, and serological markers. It is more relevant to develop risk predictive scores for application to the Indian population. This study substantiates the argument that alternative approaches to risk stratification are required in order to make them more adaptable and applicable to different populations with varying risk factor and disease patterns.
机译:对健康资源的压力越来越大,导致风险评估已成为心血管疾病(CVD)管理中必不可少的工具。人们担心将其推广到所有人群的有效性。现有的风险评分模型并未纳入新兴的“新颖”风险因素。在这种情况下,该研究的目的是检验英国,欧洲和弗雷明汉的CVD预测性危险评分与无症状高危印度人群的相关性。分析了从参与者抽取的血液样本中各种“传统”和“新”生物标志物,并完成了他们的CVD危险因素分析。 Framingham模型仅将研究队列的5%定义为高危人群,这似乎低估了这种遗传易感人群的CVD风险。这些高危受试者的血脂,促炎,血栓形成和血清学指标明显升高。制定适用于印度人口的风险预测分数更为相关。这项研究证实了这样的论点,即需要采取风险分层的替代方法,以使其更具适应性,并适用于具有不同风险因素和疾病模式的不同人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号